Anna Karenina has been on my bucket list of books forever. At almost 900 pages of classic Russian literature, featuring characters with complicated names that come with coordinating nicknames, it’s not a book you mindlessly pick up to take to the beach. First of all, it would take up your whole dang carry on. And second of all, Maggie Gyllenhaal performs—not reads, performs—an audio version of it. So, set some time aside, 36 hours if you are going to hang with Maggie, and get ready for the long haul. And when you’re ready, check out the longest book review I have ever written about the longest book I have ever read.
Warning: There are spoilers ahead, but I give you ample warning. I can’t read almost a thousand pages (or listen for almost the length of a work week) without getting really into the specifics. But first, let’s cover some basics.
Who’s Who?
Prince Stepan Arkadyevitch Oblonsky (aka Stiva) (aka Oblonsky). He’s married to Princess Darya Alexandrovna Oblonskaya (aka Dolly). Wealthy. Five kids. He’s a cheater cheater pumpkin eater.
Then there’s Stiva’s pal Konstantin Dmitrievitch Levin (aka Kostya) (aka Levin) a poor farmer who lives out in the country and is in love with Kitty.
Kitty (aka Princess Ekaterina Alexandrovna Shchebatskaya) is Dolly’s sister. She’s not in love with Levin, and in fact, she refuses Levin’s marriage proposal because she’s in love with Vronsky. #Drama!
Vronsky is a Count. Of course he is. And he’s hot, single, has money and is also known as Alexei Kirillovich Vronsky. Oh and he’s hopping in the sack with our leading lady, Anna Karenina.
Anna (aka Anna Arkadyevna Karenina) is gorgeous young wife of old and boring Karenin. She’s also the mother to Sergei Alexeyitch Karenin, or, Seryozha.
Karenin (aka Alexei Alexandrovich Karenin) is a Senior Statemen that is super concerned with his reputation and not at all happy with Anna.
There’s other characters of course, but these are the main ones and just referencing their names and nicknames probably accounts for 100 of Tolstoy’s 900 pages.
Digging In
Tolstoy has written a fascinating and epic novel of people falling in and out of love, making good and bad choices, and suffering the consequences and benefits that come from love—despite the fact that I am not sure I would call Anna Karenina a love story.
It’s more a social commentary on a young woman’s short-sighted choice to go out on her marriage—her unhappy and loveless marriage to a man twenty years her senior—that results in Karenin issuing Anna an ultimatum. She can either leave him—and their young son forever—in favor of divorce and Count Vronsky or she can keep her son and stay married, but cut off the Count. In a decision many would disagree with, Anna chooses the Count.
If you’re still with me, that means she chose to leave her son. It’s a rather shocking choice. Rarely do we look favorably upon women that choose men over their child. And, you have to remember, this was written in 1877. It was a time when women were often forced to marry young, religion prevented divorce, and the laws were not in favor of women.
And of course her relationship with Vronsky develops it’s own challenges. They have a child. A child he can’t claim as his own, because, as it turns out, Karenin won’t divorce her. Anna grows jealous of Vronsky as cheaters often do—worrying that their partners are doing to them what they initially did to their spouses. Funny how cheaters become an untrusting lot.
Spoiler Ahead!
Is it really a spoiler if the book was written over one hundred years ago? Well, I can’t share my thoughts without spilling my guts.
Anna kind of loses her mind. She spirals and and sees no way out of her situation. Karenin won’t divorce her. Vronsky can’t assure her enough that his intentions are true. She misses her son with Karenin and dislikes her daughter with Vronsky. She’s miserable and she wants others to suffer the way she perceives she has. In her misery, she recalls being at a train station years earlier, with Vronsky, when a man falls under the tracks. It’s this shocking memory that gives birth to an idea.
Yep! She throws herself under a train! A FREAKING TRAIN! And, yet, if ever there were a person’s demise so breathtaking, I think this was it. It was stunning, in a freak-show-can’t-look-away kind of way and I backed up the audio recording multiple times to hear sweet Maggie’s voice articulate it again and again.
Let’s pause for a moment.
A FREAKING TRAIN!
The Swoonworthy Part of Anna Karenina
And then, the love story that did work out—Kitty and Levin! If you recall, Kitty initially spurned Levin in favor of Vronsky. Unfortunately, Vronsky only had eyes for Anna and this left Kitty humiliated and deathly ill. Levin, still heartbroken and pining, was secretly glad to learn Kitty was single and perhaps a little deserving of the illness. Knowing Levin and Kitty should be together, the Oblonskys orchestrate a social gathering that will facilitate a meet up. Who new such a meet up would turn into a total meetcute? I will spare this spoiler; but know it involves a cryptic love note the two write each other during the party that sets the record straight and results Levin asking for her hand marriage. This scene I could also play again and again. I can’t even with the cuteness. That Tolstoy knows how to court!
The wedding day is hilarious, their relationship is full of professional bickering and a child is born. The overly contemplative and super philosophical Levin questions if he’s truly happy and learns the answer during an afternoon storm that puts his young bride and son in harm’s way. Levin and Kitty are total #CoupleGoals.
So super dramatical, right? Right. And I loved it. I loved almost every minute of it. There were some agricultural politics and Russian business mumbo jumbo that was a little snoozeworthy. But the voyeuristic view into these characters lives and choices was wholly satisfying. So much so, I am pretty sure I want to read it again. And I don’t read anything again. Certainly not 900 pages of something, Maggie or not.
So happy you loved it. It’s been some 20-25 years since I’ve read it, but I may need to do the audio with Maggie. Those Russians could write! Inspiring review!
Jennifer, Thank you! You totally need to listen to it. Mags does a tremendous job.
I second Jennifer’s response—so happy (and relieved) that you enjoyed Anna K. I take it off the shelf at least once a year and revisit my favorite scenes (like Anna’s visit to Dolly’s or Levin’s revelation in the field), but now think I’ll have to try Maggie’s audible version too.
I’m sure I’ve already shared my theory of AK with you—I don’t think the theme is love or heartbreak or even social norms, as every film version has interpreted it. I think it is a novel about distraction, how Anna (and her brother) try to fill the emptiness in their lives with distractions (romance, sex, alcohol, jealousy), which never satisfy—in contrast to the lives of Kitty and Levin that gain their meaning and therefore satisfaction from service and devotion.
And seriously, has any male other than Shakespeare written the female point of view so well as Tolstoy?
Deirdre, you might be on to something with the distraction–or the difference when you have meaning in your life or a sense of purpose (Lenin) or you don’t (Anna). Tolstoy did a tremendous job with the female perspective!
I love and hate it when someone perfectly captures how I felt about a book. I love it because the reasoning is now out there in the universe in a succinct and descriptive manner. I hate it because I wasn’t able to capture it as well. What an exceptional review. Funny aside – I listened in audio and to see the names in print was intimidating – until I realized I KNEW how to say the names. They roll off my tongue like bumpy honey because Maggie said them So. Many. Times. Thanks to Tolstoy. 100 pages out of the 900 were the names, indeed! Well done, friend! Now go watch the movie – I watched it the night after I finished the book and it really locked everything in. Wonderful.
Marne – you are kind. I also feel like having Maggie read it to me I can pronounce those names with the best of them! I also had no idea how Anna son’s name was spelled! It was enlightening to look it up in print. Totally going to check out the movie. Are you talking about the one starring Kiera Knightly?
A couple of quick thoughts: I too had this on my reading list (or my library for about 6 years) and this past summer I read it. Obviously a very good book, though, a bit of Russian soap opera.
Couple of things: Levin isn’t a poor farmer. I don’t know if he’s rich, but he has a significant farm. Secondly, as far as I’m concerned the farming politics was the most interesting and surprising part of the story, because Tolstoy is clearly depicting the early rise of communism in those scenes. He saw it coming about 30 to 40 years earlier.
Hi David,
It was totally a Russian soap opera! And, yes, Levin had a big farm… but Kitty’s parents didn’t approve of him or his societal stature. I definitely plan to read it again, and will look again at those sections. I just think he really captured the social dynamic and women, in general, so well. Thanks for chiming in!